What in the hell is this mumbo jumbo? It was discovered and then forgotten over the last 2000 years? Female prostate?
BTW: I noticed they did not mention what the fluid was that was being ejaculated. Credible evidence? Did they test the fluid to see what it was? What credible evidence?
Sidey - read the abstracts - the 1st two are meta-analyses - the authors review previous papers.
In them, people do analyze female ejaculate. (though the 1st time was only in 1982).
Unfortunately J Sex Med. is behind a paywall, even the references. Do you feel like registering and shelling out (typically) $30-40 per article? I'm less than motivated, though the survey (below) might get me to.
This abstract is a recent (2007) article in it, the abstract says: "there's still controversy", "we looked with ultrasound, endoscopy and chemical analysis", "our two subject's squirts analyze like prostate fluid, and NOT like urine".
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17634056Two years later, these folks did MRI on "female prostate pathology".
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19453901They find "parurethral glands" in 6 out of 7 subjects via MRI, but there's no relation between gland size and ejaculation status.
Just this year, they published the results of an online survey of 320 women.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11562.x/abstractMaybe we should invite the main author of these last three studies (from Austria) to the next LPIN Gathering ;-)
http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Florian_Wimpissinger/publications/Oh, the irony (at least in English), a guy named Florian Wim
pissinger is a urologist!
And in my experience, I had a lover who, when fisted (slowly, gently, ...) with stimulation of the anterior vagina (where the G-spot is located), would come very hard and she would juice (though not really squirt) from both her vagina and urethra. The vaginal stuff was a mix of the lube we used and regular female wetness. The stuff from her urethra was more viscous and whiter (though still pretty clear), and tasted kinda like come,
definitely NOT urine.
(surely in your years of snack-n-jack you started in on a woman who had just peed, and once her muscles down there started contracting due to the stimulation you got a few salty drops to know what urine tastes like?)
The concept of female ejaculation has been controversial for many reasons (rareness/hard to reproduce, feminist/anti-feminist politics, sexism, sexual shaming, the desire to have a single/simple answer, and just plain pig-headed dogmatism).
Even Masters and Johnson, having observed a few cases of it, dismissed it!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_ejaculationEven the wiki article is weasel-ish - "To date, there have been no conclusive or major studies...", then they reference the 2007 study.
Fuck that - if you find even one black swan, the proposition that "all swans are white" is disproved.
(I've seen black swans myself - in their native Australia)
The lack of easy reproducibility (by their pet method) is a bug-boo with many scientists.
This feminist blog post pointed to an study where the men-in-the-white-coats put needle electrodes in the clitorises of 38 Egyptian women and electrostimulated them to orgasm - no female ejaculation found. (But gosh, should one really expect it?)
http://www.xojane.com/sex/female-ejaculation-storiesPub-med abstract of Egyptian study:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20183002n.b. electro-ejaculation is a common method of getting semen from bulls, boars, etc.
But as was the case with my former lover, it seems to be the case that it's G-spot stimulation (in a relaxed state) that triggers female ejaculation. The Skene's glands (aka female prostate) are along the urethra, which is anterior (to the front) of the vagina.
My take is with these guys (at least their abstract, I don't read Czech).
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8004685Ejaculation/juicing by females when they orgasm can be one or more of: Skene's glands secretions, urine, and vaginal lube; depending on the female and the circumstances.