Hotness Scale -- current Mona's & Inez's Ladies vs current Hof Ladies

[RihannaLovely]

I believe that, overall, there are much more attractive ladies working at Hof houses. Working every day at the Bunny Ranch made me question my sexuality! 

Maybe I need to go and take another look at the Hof houses. When I went through recently I was actually surprised at how homogeneous things were as far as looks between houses. That is to say, attractiveness of ladies does not seem to vary much between houses, only the price and service quality does, and price is not always coupled directly to service quality or looks.

I agree that the "level of attractiveness" does not seem to vary  from house to house. This is a smart plan. If you put all the attractive ladies in House A and all the ugly ladies in House B, who would ever go to House B? So the aim is to have strong, balanced lineups in all of the houses and I believe this is accomplished to the best of management's ability in Carson City. It is the only way to have 3 or 4 successful houses in the same area.

But there is a high turnover rate of ladies across all aspects of the industry. . .and across all forms of sex work in general. So the lineup can differ greatly from week to week. There are times when I thought Sagebrush had the hottest lineup, other times when Love Ranch seemed to have the hottest lineup, and other times when Bunny Ranch seemed to have the hottest lineup. It's not a static situation.

One advantage that the Bunny Ranch management has over other houses is that they are the most famous ranch and essentially have the first pick of ladies applying. This allows them to select only the highest quality ladies available while other houses with less fame may be forced to simply accept any applicant in order to fill the house.  With the addition of Kit Kat, there will be more ladies waiting for you in Carson City than any other place in the country. . .it's a unique opportunity for the customer.

[nlx]

I believe that, overall, there are much more attractive ladies working at Hof houses. Working every day at the Bunny Ranch made me question my sexuality! 

Maybe I need to go and take another look at the Hof houses. When I went through recently I was actually surprised at how homogeneous things were as far as looks between houses. That is to say, attractiveness of ladies does not seem to vary much between houses, only the price and service quality does, and price is not always coupled directly to service quality or looks.

I agree that the "level of attractiveness" does not seem to vary  from house to house. This is a smart plan. If you put all the attractive ladies in House A and all the ugly ladies in House B, who would ever go to House B? So the aim is to have strong, balanced lineups in all of the houses and I believe this is accomplished to the best of management's ability in Carson City. It is the only way to have 3 or 4 successful houses in the same area.

But there is a high turnover rate of ladies across all aspects of the industry. . .and across all forms of sex work in general. So the lineup can differ greatly from week to week. There are times when I thought Sagebrush had the hottest lineup, other times when Love Ranch seemed to have the hottest lineup, and other times when Bunny Ranch seemed to have the hottest lineup. It's not a static situation.

One advantage that the Bunny Ranch management has over other houses is that they are the most famous ranch and essentially have the first pick of ladies applying. This allows them to select only the highest quality ladies available while other houses with less fame may be forced to simply accept any applicant in order to fill the house.  With the addition of Kit Kat, there will be more ladies waiting for you in Carson City than any other place in the country. . .it's a unique opportunity for the customer.

I will keep that in mind. The turnover and selection at any given time is a big variable.

[MrTShirt]

I agree that the "level of attractiveness" does not seem to vary  from house to house...

But there is a high turnover rate of ladies across all aspects of the industry. . .

When I see a lineup of girls I can't tell any difference between houses, whether the house is big or small, urban or rural, north or south.  Of course, my memory is short, almost as short as something else.

I have wondered about the turnover rate of customers.  It would be a interesting survey to find out the numbers of how many are:

- one timer
- someone who plays the field with different girls and houses
- someone who develops an ATF

[Shooter]

I have wondered about the turnover rate of customers.  It would be a interesting survey to find out the numbers of how many are:

- one timer
- someone who plays the field with different girls and houses
- someone who develops an ATF

I think that the customer turnover rate is quite high.   For those of us who have stuck around I think you will find our styles have evolved.  We all at one point found an ATF. Most of us have moved between  houses and ladies and types of ladies for that matter.  I do believe however that the number of one timers is much greater today than it was say 20-25 years ago. The reason for this should be obviou$.

[highdrive]

I agree that the "level of attractiveness" does not seem to vary  from house to house...

But there is a high turnover rate of ladies across all aspects of the industry. . .

When I see a lineup of girls I can't tell any difference between houses, whether the house is big or small, urban or rural, north or south.  Of course, my memory is short, almost as short as something else.

I have wondered about the turnover rate of customers.  It would be a interesting survey to find out the numbers of how many are:

- one timer
- someone who plays the field with different girls and houses
- someone who develops an ATF

At some point, I was all of these. Lol.
Lately though, I keep coming back to LPIN. Why? Probably because I can.
Plus, it's almost like many of these ladies are far more attractive in terms of both looks and personality than women I meet outside of LPIN. But that could just be subjective.

HD

[jadecapri]

I have seen pictures from ladies at those Ranches and they are very pretty. I don't think it's a matter of who looks better in pictures, line ups and such. It's who you meet and have that sparkle with. Of course a picture is a start for someone that has never been here, but now days we have so much info out there that is day to have a pretty good idea.
The lady or ladies who have the best time with. That is why I encourage guys that are looking to learn from me to open their minds to body type, hair color, age and more. People that are more open to all types have fun and enjoy life more. To me there is not a scale per se, but there are girls that I can't take my eyes off, but if I was a man I don't necessarily would hang out with. I guess the same goes to men for me. I rather fun, engaging, interesting versus the looks. I can see beauty in many people.

[lurkinghottie]

Jade! C'mon! Coy is cute, but every man/woman/breathing entity wants to be w you! Seriously! You're stature, shape, accent etc. Everyone knows  you're a gal to get with. Definitely too beautiful to deny, and too pro to over-look. You are DEF a gal every man wants, every gal wants to be/even just be with .

You have been so blessed, and I can appreciate (as a fellow lady) that you appreciate it. Im not interested in Hof houses, but you are quite the view and I shall look. Have a nice night

[RachelVarga]

In some ways it's not fair to compare like this because it objectifies women. But if you want an answer I will say that we can handle our own at the Bunny Ranch and women like Faith, Jade, and Kiteh could make me go full out lesbian.

[highdrive]

In some ways it's not fair to compare like this because it objectifies women. But if you want an answer I will say that we can handle our own at the Bunny Ranch and women like Faith, Jade, and Kiteh could make me go full out lesbian.

serious question:
so knowing that I'm a male, I'll still do my best not to objectify women and so forth. I'm not wanting to create distance by any means or to treat anyone as if I'm better than they are. But as far as women I'd want to have sex with, isn't it alright to have some leeway as to whether or not I'd lust after a sex provider?

After all, these four ladies including Rachel are pretty damn hot in many ways. Besides, I'd hardly party with someone I wasn't physically or mentally or emotionally attracted to.

I do think that without objectification, the market for sex providers might be a little less. Right?

Or maybe I'm just looking way into this objectifying thing and wasting time watching today's baseball games/NBA/NHL playoffs.
HD

[COH]

I have seen pictures from ladies at those Ranches and they are very pretty. I don't think it's a matter of who looks better in pictures, line ups and such. It's who you meet and have that sparkle with. Of course a picture is a start for someone that has never been here, but now days we have so much info out there that is day to have a pretty good idea.
The lady or ladies who have the best time with. That is why I encourage guys that are looking to learn from me to open their minds to body type, hair color, age and more. People that are more open to all types have fun and enjoy life more. To me there is not a scale per se, but there are girls that I can't take my eyes off, but if I was a man I don't necessarily would hang out with. I guess the same goes to men for me. I rather fun, engaging, interesting versus the looks. I can see beauty in many people.

An interesting post..... "rather have fun, engaging, interesting versus looks".   Here's a scenario though.  In previous posts mentioned a Lady's personality is equally important to a Lady's looks.  And at the start of the topic said, "True every client will have a different opinion about a Lady's looks".  Just will say there are BEAUTIFUL LADIES who are FUN, ENGAGING, and INTERESTING.

[ColtsFan90]

If we're talking about an "objective" rating, then you could use BMI/BF%.  It's been scientifically shown that the lower the body fat percentage, the more attractive a girl is rated on average.  Something like waist/hip ratio doesn't have much of an impact, by comparison.



Based on that, I'd have to give it to the Mona's/Inez's girls on average, since just about all of them look healthy, while I've seen plenty of overweight girls at Hof houses.  Still, I'd agree with earlier sentiments that the most attractive girls in the industry are at Hof's houses, if only because of having a higher number of girls to choose from.

[lurkinghottie]

I was just sending good vibes and compliments. I didnt mean she's the only pretty girl out there- not at all.

[MrTShirt]

If we're talking about an "objective" rating, then you could use BMI/BF%...

At last, a scientific way of deciding who is hot and who isn't.

Wonder where I would fit?

On a tour in Egypt many years ago, the Egyptian staff were fretting about one of the girls on our tour because she was too thin, and would never get a man.  I did notice the Egyptian females were "chunky".  This included the belly dancers.  They sure had a lot to shake.

[Tobie]

If we're talking about an "objective" rating, then you could use BMI/BF%.  It's been scientifically shown that the lower the body fat percentage, the more attractive a girl is rated on average.  Something like waist/hip ratio doesn't have much of an impact, by comparison.



Based on that, I'd have to give it to the Mona's/Inez's girls on average, since just about all of them look healthy, while I've seen plenty of overweight girls at Hof houses.  Still, I'd agree with earlier sentiments that the most attractive girls in the industry are at Hof's houses, if only because of having a higher number of girls to choose from.

Not everyone  wants a petite woman.  Give me Hollywood over a spinner any day of the week!

I know Meghan Trainor and I are not alone in this...

[Nelspot]

I haven't as yet had the opportunity to meet the new ladies at Inez's, so I can't speak about them personally.  What I can say though is that eye appeal isn't everything.  As I get older (as we all do, day-to-day) I find that a lady's photogenicity does not equate (necessarily) to her interpersonal skills, nor her sexual skills, both valuable assets in this hobby.  Whereas one day I would have jumped at the opportunity to bed a gorgeous lady, now I find I'll take one with a beautiful mind over just a sexy body.

I really miss Coco and Linda from Inez's, and if I could see either of them again, I'd jump at the opportunity.