So I was reading the post Jack created and decided to recreate this post.... I'm commenting on everything I read from everyone that needs to be addressed. I have worked many years in this profession legally prior to Sheri's and the health regulations have not changed in all these years. When I started (10 years ago) there was a health regulation of no fluid exchange.... Glad to see only so many houses/ladies try to enforce this. Point blank I.C.'s are choosing whether to follow health regulations that exist, Sheri's isn't being strict by educating and trying to enforce safety.
I think respectable women who care about themselves and others will provide clean, safe parties with no fluid exchange. Women who care about their safety will use a condom during intercourse, bj's, titty fucking, they will use dental dam when a man goes down on them and they will not intimately kiss every man they party with (which is disgusting)... If an I.C. wants to cover her precious hands from raw dick, let her. The only way to legally offer anal is to be tested of it, if a lady isn't tested, she shouldn't be offering.
You can be sensual and intimate without breaking health regulations so why talk so much shit of ladies and houses who care to keep you safe?!. Courtesans can catch a STD just as well as the rest of the world if we are not careful. All you men taking shit about women/houses that don't do or promote activities "your way" just sound so dirty. All you women promoting all your unclean activities are nasty and you just scared off the men who care about safety. Lol, Thank you
The only thing that Sheri's is strict of is not allowing out-dates and more days out in town (I really wish we could do more, but it's ok). The fact that I agree to abide by the house rules of Sheri's should tell everyone that I love the environment Sheri's offers me... I applaud Sheri's for trying to inform former and new I.C.'s of do's and don'ts that have existed over 10 years and no one else seems to care.
Hi Red,
You might be surprised about this, but I am in agreement with a good deal of what you wrote when it comes to safety and I think most of the "dirty" men on this board value safety or else they would be having sex with escorts or street prostitutes rather than through LPIN. Condoms? Absolutely. It's the law and I care about my health and insist on safety. My "raw dick" (your words - seriously, are you that averse to penis?) is covered at all times! If not, the lady has a female condom always.
However though, where I disagree with you and it it sounds like Sheri's management, is when it becomes a matter of choice for the independent contractor…When the law is silent she has the choice to do with her body what she damn well pleases. Isn't that what Nevada is all about anyway…don't tell me what to do, get your damn hands off my body?
For example….DATY. I have had the opportunity many times. I will say this, ladies generally enjoy DATY without a dam in parties and in my experience, many want it. I personally tend not to partake as I've read the studies on oral cancer and so I avoid. Even though I'm majorly tempted! According to the statute that Ewysing noted, oral-genital contact without a cover is prohibited by state law so I will take that at it's face value and agree. But to persuade ladies to avoid DATY altogether as a practice is not state law but brothel policy and I say, BULLSHIT. In the ideal world, only the law should dictate what an independent contractor can, and cannot do. True, a private business is free to create their own policies if it wants to. But the independent can always leave that business and it sounds like some have left Sheri's for this very reason.
The same can be said for kissing. I see no health regulation related to fluid exchange and if a lady WANTS to kiss, brothel policy should not limit her. In addition, other ladies should not be pressuring her like some sort of brothel groupthink IMO.
I also wanted to object a bit with you on another point you made… I don't believe there is any expectation here stated from guys on this board that a working girl HAS to "intimately kiss" each and every man who walks through the door. Hell, I wouldn't do that either…I've SEEN a lot of the guys who walk through the door! LOL But, again it's her choice. Don't assume that every man is "dirty." My hygiene is excellent (and I've been told so). I party with ladies who actually like to kiss with me (and who are not showing visible signs of oral herpes). I always ask first if they want to. Kissing is totally a chemistry thing. It's human. If a lady doesn't want to kiss, we won't party and I'll find someone who I click with who wants to. Simple as that - no coercion involved. But to pressure a lady NOT to kiss via brothel policy or by group pressure when she wants to is wrong. IMO, it's her choice. It's her body.
I will also not use surgical gloves or party with ladies who don't like to be touched in certain areas. If they don't want to be touched or if they insist that I wear gloves on my hands like I am a doctor in a clinical setting, they can party with someone who will pay them to do all of these things (yeah,good luck with that). Personally, I wouldn't be turned on by those activities. But again, it's the ladies choice if they insist on this and I won't party with them.
But don't expect ME to do all these things when touching and kissing isn't even against the law. Wanting it "my way" as long as I stay within the law doesn't make me a nasty man or unclean. Yes, there are some risks of getting a cold, picking up oral herpes, or even the very low risk of picking up gonorrhea of the mouth through kissing. But compared to other risks in life, I just don't worry about it. I don't feel bad at all for wanting it my way and if I'm treated like I'm weird for wanting normal sex, I'll just vote with my feet and go to another brothel that will treat me like a customer..and not like a "dirty" man.
JR